ACK! SCSI Not WOrking
- To: debian-user list <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: ACK! SCSI Not WOrking
- From: Stephen Carpenter <sjc@delphi.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 21:37:00 -0400 (EDT)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980429213014.302A-100000@Shit-Box.carpanet>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I got my SCSI tape drive and I installed a SCSI card I had lying around
unfortunatly it didn't work :(
I THINK the problem may be the controller...
I get the messages:
aha152x: processing commandline: ok
aha152x: BIOS test: passed, detected 1 controller(s)
aha152x0: vital data: PORTBASE=0x140, IRQ=9, SCSI ID=7, reconnect=enabled,
parity=enabled, synchronous=disabled, delay=100, extended
translation=disabled
aha152x: trying software interrupt, lost.
aha152x: IRQ 9 possibly wrong. Please verify.
- ---
I have tried IRQ 11 with the same effect...then it is...
scsi0 : Adaptec 152x SCSI driver; $Revision: 1.18 $
scsi : 1 host.
scsi : aborting command due to timeout : pid 0, scsi0, channel 0, id 0,
lun 0 Test Unit Ready 00 00 00 00 00
- --- repeated for id 0 - 6
The SCSI card is from a ZIP SCSI drive (I got it for free from omeone
who already had a SCSI card and installed a ZIP)
It calls itself (written on the board) an
Adaptec AVA-1502
the Tape drive apears to be (jumpers) SCSI ID 4, Parity on, Termination
power on
Any ideas? should I just forget it asnd buy a new adapter?
I recompiled my kernel...turned on SCSI supoert and
all of the Adaptec Drivers ...I am running Kernel 2.0.29
(on a hamm system but I doubt that matters)
I read the SCSI-HOWTO...but it was of no help :(
- -Steve
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNUfVwnxvn0zebBV9AQGVBAQAhe8UovDSlOKNS6ZPVWw+Ux4EHcRqfJm8
qeGY7+dzJmQM8eHdW+In0kGwpKxVbzmefIJT0tSXsXT1tQHJzKlwl9SzEWcGwFzV
ZMI6xA4Zj3AfcUskCNkPNWXfOxyw8ouFxBKOaVyePaGjwc7sk+Fboks+e5ivLhSX
ObyL+LUidvo=
=ri2i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: