Re: Upgrading to hamm
- To: Jaakko Niemi <liiwi@lonesom.pp.fi>
- Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Upgrading to hamm
- From: Jeff Noxon <jeff@planetfall.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 1998 08:33:51 -0500
- Message-id: <19980416083351.34787@mystic>
- In-reply-to: <liiwi-980415211656.A018748@lonesom>; from Jaakko Niemi on Wed, Apr 15, 1998 at 09:16:57PM +0300
- References: <19980415090656.21508@mystic> <liiwi-980415211656.A018748@lonesom>
On Wed, Apr 15, 1998 at 09:16:57PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
> >> I have 2.0.33 running on an ABIT IT5H 2.0, K6-233 w/ 64 megs of RAM.
>
> I think that motherboard is based on the TX chipset, which does not cache
> any memory over 64mb. So adding more than that is most propably worse.
It's based on the HX chipset, and can use/cache up to 512M. I would never
purchase a TX chipset board. 8)
> Btw. you did tell the kernel to look for all the memory? There just might be
> some misunderstanding between kernel/bios/chipset about how much memory
> there actually is.
I added 'append "mem=128"' to lilo.conf. I guess I could try 127. Linux
saw the memory, which explains the massive performance increase.
Thanks
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: