Re: Upgrading to hamm
>>
>> And some 2.0.33 systems (mine at least) are quite stable with hamm.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>
>Quite possible if it only runs a few hours/day or is lightly loaded. I
>would consider it a ticking timebomb, though. One particular system of
>
we have quite a few systems running 2.0.33 up 24/7 with plenty of
people constantly running plenty of cpu intensive simulation jobs and
i haven't had any of them crash on me yet. your mileage may vary
though.
--alex--
--
| I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active |
| advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with |
| automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion |
| and thus to help to discredit completely the world of reality. |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: