Re: Upgrading to hamm
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Bob Nielsen wrote:
>
> And some 2.0.33 systems (mine at least) are quite stable with hamm.
>
> Bob
>
Quite possible if it only runs a few hours/day or is lightly loaded. I
would consider it a ticking timebomb, though. One particular system of
mine that always runs at a load =>3 would not stay up more than a few days
at a time with .33 though I did get almost two weeks out if it once.
George Bonser
If I had a catchy quip, it would be here.
http://www.debian.org
Debian/GNU Linux ... the maintainable operating system.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: