Re: Upgrading to hamm

To: Chris <chris@ormond.unimelb.edu.au>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Upgrading to hamm
From: George Bonser <grep@oriole.sbay.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 00:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980415000104.27176E-100000@calvin.shorelink.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980415164139.10311A-100000@seldon.ormond.unimelb.edu.au>

On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Chris wrote:

> I am, however, conserned about stablility...
> 
> Does anyone know of any major problems with a hamm system?
> 
> Chris

Only on systems that have run 2.0.33.  All systems running 2.0.32 are
fine.  There are none of the problems that Red Hat has been having with
its 5.0 release.

George Bonser

If I had a catchy quip, it would be here.

http://www.debian.org
Debian/GNU Linux ... the maintainable operating system.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Upgrading to hamm
  - From: Bob Nielsen <nielsen@primenet.com>

References:
- Upgrading to hamm
  - From: Chris <chris@ormond.unimelb.edu.au>

Prev by Date: Faster swap by using separate disk?
Next by Date: RE: Upgrading to hamm
Previous by thread: Upgrading to hamm
Next by thread: Re: Upgrading to hamm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread