Re: RAID installation in hamm?
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>
>> On Sun, 12 Apr 1998, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>> > >> I suposse that I'll have to setup manually (including installation of
>> > >> raidtools) the raid partitions in the installation shell (console Alt+F2),
>> > >> isn't it?
>> >
>> > Or install normally, then create the md-partition, boot from rescue-disk, mount /,
>> > copy dir xyz xyz.bak, copy the contents to md-partition, edit fstab etc to mount
>> > the md-partition as xyz and boot.
>>
>> Yes, I think It will be by far easier, also because I suposse that I'll
>> have to build a raid0 capable kernel
>>
>> > >> Also I'm not sure where to put the scripts that launch mdadd/mdrun/mdstop
>> > >> programs.
>> >
>> > Which scripts? /etc/init.d/raid ?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>> I have unpacked hamm raidtools to look /etc/init.d/raid and I have yet
>> another question:
>>
>> Local filesystems are mounted in /etc/init.d/boot
>> so I have to suposse that /etc/init.d/raid is called from it before
>> mounting local filesystems, isn't it?
>>
>> In a bo installation is:
>>
>> # Mount local file systems in /etc/fstab.
>> #
>> [ "$VERBOSE" != no ] && echo "Mounting local file systems ..."
>> mount -avt nonfs,noproc
>>
>> so a check to look for /etc/init.d/raid is made before and then if the
>> script exist (and is executable) is called, isn't it?
The mountall.sh script is in my hamm system called from /etc/rcS.d/
with priority 35, so I've made raid to start with 25 because it has to be
started before. Take a look at the README in that directory and chapter
3.4 in the Policy Manual for more info.
Also please note, that my system is not necessarily 100% 'kosher', as I
have not (yet) taken the time to read that chapter in manual :)
--j
>>
>> Thanks for your info, I think this info should be in the install.txt
>> (Any developper looking here? should be posted to somewhere?)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: