kernel-headers-2.0.32 vs. kernel-headers-2.0.33

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: kernel-headers-2.0.32 vs. kernel-headers-2.0.33
From: Tamas Papp <tpapp@students.ahuwc.k12.nm.us>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 14:47:54 -0600 (MDT)
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980412144515.11779C-100000@students.ahuwc.k12.nm.us>
Reply-to: Tamas Papp <tpapp@students.ahuwc.k12.nm.us>

Does anyone know why libc6-dev doesn't accept kernel-headers-2.0.33? It
depends on kernel-headers, but it only works with the 2.0.32 one.

jabberwock

###    By lack of understanding they remained sane. (George Orwell)    ###


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: kernel-headers-2.0.32 vs. kernel-headers-2.0.33
  - From: George Bonser <grep@oriole.sbay.org>
- Re: kernel-headers-2.0.32 vs. kernel-headers-2.0.33
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [pwink@ibm.net: telnet does not allow login as "root"]
Next by Date: RE: [pwink@ibm.net: telnet does not allow login as "root"]
Previous by thread: RE: Reverse DNS lookup at telnet
Next by thread: Re: kernel-headers-2.0.32 vs. kernel-headers-2.0.33
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread