RE: Win95 and Linux: Was: Verified Re: Unidentified subject!
Dunno - like I said, I skipped installing LILO completely (because it
said the 1024-cyl limit in the docs). Loadlin worked fine for running
things... Now if I can find the odd problem with my domainname not
talking to dselect I can call it working! :-)
> ----------
> From: David E. Scott[SMTP:DaveScott@1000islands.com]
> Reply To: DaveScott@1000islands.com
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 1998 8:04 PM
> To: Hogland, Thomas E.
> Cc: 'Stephen Carpenter'; 'debian-user@lists.debian.org'
> Subject: Re: Win95 and Linux: Was: Verified Re: Unidentified
> subject!
>
> Tom,
> I take it, then, that you found that loadlin is not restricted
> by the
> 1024cyl boundary, but that LILO definitly still is limited by that
> boundary?
> Dave
>
>
> Hogland, Thomas E. wrote:
> >
> > Well, I hesitate to say it's not there, but I installed it and it
> runs
> > fine. Note that I DON'T use LILO, didn't install LILO, and didn't do
> any
> > fiddling with my config files. I'm using a Compaq Presario 4840
> > (PII-266), so it's not much of a wait to boot to Win95 and run the
> > Linux95 program :-)...
> >
> > Future plans, use Partition Magic to move my Debian partition to the
> > front of the drive and install LILO so I can skip the 45-second
> delay
> > waiting for Win95 to boot <g>. (I absolutely LOVE how fast Debian
> loads
> > on this thing!)
> >
>
>
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: