Re: qmail? (was:Re: sendmail vs smail)
>>Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
>A related question: is there any chance of getting a Debianized
>distribution of qmail in the near future? A mere source could do.
You can use a non-debianized version: the only difference is that
Debian already have qmail users and groups in /etc/passwd & /etc/group
so you'll need to skip most of INSTALL.ids part of qmail setup.
And you'll need to write a startup script.
>I know that there is qmail in project/experimental (at least my mirror
>has it), but I'd rather not use alpha software -- and I think I would
>be violating Dan's copyright if I were to use the experimental
>package, wouldn't I?
I don't know about the copyright, or why using debianized qmail-1.0
in experimental would be different from using non-debianized qmail-1.0
wrt copy rites. I'm using it, and I've been using non-debianized qmail
before Christian packaged it, and they haven't arrested me (yet). :)
By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meet
the definition of a telephone fax machine. By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it
is unlawful to send any unsolicited advertisement to such equipment.
By Sec.227(b)(3)(C), a violation of the aforementioned Section is
punishable by action to recover actual monetary loss, or $500,
whichever is greater, for each violation.
(Solicited advertisements <huh?> and other such can be sent to
emaziuk at curtin dot edu dot au)
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .
- Re: qmail?
- From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <firstname.lastname@example.org>