Re: stable or not stable?

["Brian N. Borg" <bborg@iaxs.net>]

I am in fact using 2.1.36 and it seems pretty stable, a lot more so 
than 2.1.31 or 2.0.30.  All my modules load without complaining 
about missing symbols.  The only problem is that kerneld won't load 
them on demand.  

--Brian


Rick Jones wrote:
> 
> I agree.  I thought I'd seen someone using 2.1.36 but thought it was a
> typo.  I would like to see the absolute latest kernel's in unstable.
> Seems to me that's what it's for.  I seems to be used more as pre-stable
> than unstable (a subtle difference).
> 
> --Rick
> 
> rickya@siservices.net


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .