Re: stable or not stable?
On Fri, 9 May 1997, Rick Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 9 May 1997, Eduardo Goyanes wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm writing to satisfy my curiousity on why the llinux kernel 2.0.30 is in
> >
> > the unstable archives. When a.b.c and b is even the file is stable.
> >
> > what is the best way to upgrade the kernel for a linux Debian v1.2?
>
>
> A good question. I'd also like to know what the actual current kernel
> version is, since I see people on other list's using 2.0.35?
I do admit I haven't been following too closely lately, but the reason
2.0.30 is not in stable is more than likely because it is a pretty major
adittion to the 2.0 kernels. The TCP/IP stack got many patches to improve
speed. If we are up to 0.35 already then I'd say whoever decided not to
put 0.30 in bo made the right choice :>
Jason
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: