Re: ETA of the new X packages
I can't be sure that 2.0.24 was the cause, but maelstrom won't
run right now because it claims that it cannot allocate 'X shared
memory' or some such thing. Lately, I upgraded many things including
libc5 and 2.0.6 -> 2.0.24 before I noticed this. Anyway, when
I can spare a few hours of modem time, I'll be getting the 2.0.23
sources to compare.
Syrus.
----------------------------------------------------------
Syrus Nemat-Nasser <syrus@ucsd.edu> UCSD Physics Dept.
On Thu, 7 Nov 1996, Gerry Jensen wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Nov 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
>
> > I'd like to hear more about what breaks with 2.0.24 .
>
> Some people have reported that X is slower in 2.0.24. Linus is looking
> into the cause.
>
> Gerry
>
> --
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
> debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
>
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: