Re: does libc5.4.7 belong in Rex
On 31 Oct 1996, Guy Maor wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Oct 1996, Buddha Buck wrote:
> > While I agree with this, why does it seem that recompiling some
> > packages "fixes" the problem?
> Which packages specifically?
> Daniel Stringfield <email@example.com> writes:
> > Its the way the LIBC changes some calls. (When I upgraded to 5.4.4 it
> > broke my PS.) I've since now upgraded to the newer Debian PS, which works
> > fine..
> I guess you mean gs, and it crashed because it invoked undefined
No, I mean ps. As in processes...
Send email for more information on the Jacksonville Linux Users Group!
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com