Re: rdate, wtmp ...

To: "Debian-PL" <debian-user-polish@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: rdate, wtmp ...
From: "Radoslaw Antoniuk" <radek@lodz.debian-pl.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 16:00:53 +0200
Message-id: <001401c272c0$f2a2d480$0279a8c0@intranet>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0210130419270.26228-100000@fatcat.ftj.agh.edu.pl> <20021013151205.B29823@gnu.univ.gda.pl>

> Czyli chyba tak ma być. U mnie też tak jest.
>

Tia. Tez tak mialem. polecam zamiast tego ntpdate.


--
Radosław Antoniuk
Warden | GG: 260 746 | +48 502 273 393 | radek@lodz.debian-pl.org |
#lgul || #debian.pl

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: rdate, wtmp ...
  - From: Marcin <jakubek@fatcat.ftj.agh.edu.pl>

References:
- rdate, wtmp ...
  - From: Marcin <jakubek@fatcat.ftj.agh.edu.pl>
- Re: rdate, wtmp ...
  - From: Marcin Sochacki <wanted@gnu.univ.gda.pl>

Prev by Date: Re: Niedostepny NFS i wiszace procesy
Next by Date: Re: Niedostepny NFS i wiszace procesy
Previous by thread: Re: rdate, wtmp ...
Next by thread: Re: rdate, wtmp ...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread