[gelöst] Re: Dokumentation ist non-free?

[Holger Nessen <inv_id@gmx.de>]

Hi,

danke für die Antwort. Nun versteh ich das endlich.

Gruß,
Holger

Am Thu, 11 Jan 2018 21:11:15 +0100
schrieb Mechtilde <ooo@mechtilde.de>:

> Hallo Holger,
> 
> Du hast den Teil selber zuitiert:
> 
> > This
> >  package contains the architecture independent infrastructure that
> > is not compliant with the Debian Free Software Guidelines.  In
> >  particular, this includes some of the GNU Emacs info pages, as they
> >  are covered under the GFDL, and specify invariant sections.  See
> >  http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001 for more information.  
> 
> > Description-en: GNU Emacs common non-DFSG items, including the core
> > documentation This package includes the core Emacs documentation:
> > the Emacs Info pages, the Emacs Lisp Reference Manual, and the
> > Emacs Lisp Intro. .
> >  GNU Emacs is the extensible self-documenting text editor.  This
> >  package contains the architecture independent infrastructure that
> > is not compliant with the Debian Free Software Guidelines.  In
> >  particular, this includes some of the GNU Emacs info pages, as they
> >  are covered under the GFDL, and specify invariant sections.  See
> >  http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001 for more information.  
> 
> 
> Das entscheidende ist, dass die Dokumentation unter der GFDL steht
> *und* nicht veränderbare Teile enthält.
> 
> Gruß
>