Re: Wlan + wicd = mal up, mal down

To: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Wlan + wicd = mal up, mal down
From: Helge Reimer <hrnews@onlinehome.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 22:20:14 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 2205809.7Xf5vBSGEX@debian64>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20170616200844.GA22521@hermes.local.trikaliotis.net>
References: <[🔎] a6f73abc-4102-f7a8-3605-c98f0fa89750@t-online.de> <[🔎] 20170616142502.GH4333@smallapple.itcfollmann.com> <[🔎] 20170616200844.GA22521@hermes.local.trikaliotis.net>

Am Freitag, 16. Juni 2017, 22:08:44 CEST schrieb Spiro Trikaliotis:

> Was spricht gegen die statische Konfiguration in
> /etc/network/interfaces?

Was spricht in diesem Fall gegen systemd? openrc kanns ja scheinbar auch nicht 
besser.

http://xmodulo.com/switch-from-networkmanager-to-systemd-networkd.html

Reply to:

References:
- Wlan + wicd = mal up, mal down
  - From: Lindermann <jenslindermann@t-online.de>
- Re: Wlan + wicd = mal up, mal down
  - From: Henning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com>
- Re: Wlan + wicd = mal up, mal down
  - From: Spiro Trikaliotis <list-debian-user-german@spiro.trikaliotis.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Wlan + wicd = mal up, mal down
Next by Date: Re: Xen-VM starten
Previous by thread: Re: Wlan + wicd = mal up, mal down
Next by thread: Re: Wlan + wicd = mal up, mal down
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread