Re: Unerwuenschte Backports-Pakete

To: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Unerwuenschte Backports-Pakete
From: Dirk Griesbach <spamthis@freenet.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:16:44 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20130923081644.GA19866@freenet.de>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user-german@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 15f9e2c2b901867c91e9d789f79db337.squirrel@postweb.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <[🔎] 15f9e2c2b901867c91e9d789f79db337.squirrel@postweb.cs.uni-dortmund.de>

Am Mo, 23. Sep 2013 um 09:39:24 +0200 schrieb Christoph Pleger:
> Woran kann es liegen, dass bei den automatischen Upgrades trotzdem
> Backports-Pakete installiert werden?

Was sagt "apt-cache policy"?

Dirk

Reply to:

References:
- Unerwuenschte Backports-Pakete
  - From: "Christoph Pleger" <Christoph.Pleger@cs.tu-dortmund.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Panasonic Lumix mounts only readonly
Next by Date: Re: Panasonic Lumix mounts only readonly
Previous by thread: Re: Unerwuenschte Backports-Pakete
Next by thread: Re: Unerwuenschte Backports-Pakete
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread