PECL::idn. installieren, aber libidn11 ist nicht aktuell?
Hi,
OpenMailAdmin benötigt PECL::idn.
Ich habe das bei http://pecl.php.net/get/idn heruntergeladen.
Aber
./configure --with-idn schlägt fehl, weil :
eventuell der fehlende Parameter -R beim Compiler Probleme macht (siehe
unten)?
Und ein Pfad nicht gefunden wird. (siehe unten)
libidn11 habe ich auch reinstalliert.
Wer kennt sich damit aus?
Danke
-------------------8>--------------------------------------------------
$ ./configure --with-idn
checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep
checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E
checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /bin/sed
checking for gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables...
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking whether gcc and cc understand -c and -o together... yes
checking for system library directory... lib
checking if compiler supports -R... no
checking if compiler supports -Wl,-rpath,... yes
checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
checking target system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
checking for PHP prefix... /usr
checking for PHP includes... -I/usr/include/php5
-I/usr/include/php5/main -I/usr/include/php5/TSRM
-I/usr/include/php5/Zend -I/usr/include/php5/ext
-I/usr/include/php5/ext/date/lib
checking for PHP extension directory... /usr/lib/php5/20060613
checking for PHP installed headers prefix... /usr/include/php5
checking for re2c... re2c
checking for re2c version... 0.13.5 (ok)
checking for gawk... gawk
checking for GNU Libidn support... yes, shared
checking for idn files in default path... not found
configure: error: Please reinstall the GNU Libidn distribution
-------------------<8--------------------------------------------------
Reply to: