[mailman][postfix-mysql][help] Je me prends le chou et Gmail et Postfix me font devenir chèvre :
Bonsoir à tous,
comme je l'ai raconté dans un message précédent, j'ai installé Mailman sur un serveur Debian
avec php-fpm et NginX avec lequel je n'ai pas encore résolu tous mes ennuis d'interface Web.
Maintenant, j'ai en plus des problèmes de délivrabilité, notamment avec Gmail et Hotmail :
# cat mail.log
=========================================================================
Mar 15 19:11:06 ma_machine postfix/smtp[19710]: E8F38420143: to=<xxxxxx@gmail.com>, relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2a00:1450:400c:c02::1b]:25, delay=2.1, delays=1.3/0.02/0.21/0.64, dsn=4.7.1, status=SOFTBOUNCE (host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2a00:1450:400c:c02::1b] said: 550-5.7.1 [2001:41d0:8:c826::1] Our system has detected that this message does 550-5.7.1 not meet IPv6 sending guidelines regarding PTR records and 550-5.7.1 authentication. Please review 550-5.7.1 https://support.google.com/mail/?p=ipv6_authentication_error for more 550 5.7.1 information. z16si25936559wmc.51 - gsmtp (in reply to end of DATA command))
=========================================================================
Mar 15 18:53:47 ma_machine postfix/smtp[19615]: 27AD2420116: lost connection with mx4.hotmail.com[65.54.188.126] while performing the HELO handshake
Mar 15 18:53:47 ma_machine postfix/smtp[19609]: CE187420115: lost connection with mx3.hotmail.com[65.55.37.72] while performing the HELO handshake
# postconf -n
=========================================================================
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases, hash:/var/lib/mailman/data/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
config_directory = /etc/postfix
disable_vrfy_command = yes
inet_interfaces = all
mailbox_size_limit = 0
mailman_destination_recipient_limit = 1
mydestination = XX.XX.XX.in-addr.arpa, localhost.localdomain, localhost
myhostname = XX.XX.XX.in-addr.arpa
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, XX.XX.XX
myorigin = 38.191.135.5.in-addr.arpa
policy_time_limit = 3600
recipient_delimiter = +
relay_domains = $mydestination, subdomain.example.com
relayhost =
smtpd_banner = $myhostname ESMTP $mail_name (Debian/GNU)
smtpd_client_restrictions = sleep 1, reject_unauth_pipelining, permit_mynetworks
smtpd_helo_required = yes
smtpd_helo_restrictions = reject_unknown_helo_hostname, reject_invalid_helo_hostname
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_non_fqdn_recipient, permit_sasl_authenticated, check_policy_service unix:private/policy, check_relay_domains
smtpd_sender_restrictions = warn_if_reject, permit_mynetworks
soft_bounce = yes
transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_transports.cf
virtual_alias_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_aliases.cf,mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_aliases_comptes.cf
virtual_gid_maps = static:5000
virtual_mailbox_base = /var/spool/vmail/
virtual_mailbox_domains = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_domaines.cf
virtual_mailbox_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual_comptes.cf
virtual_uid_maps = static:5000
# cat mail.warn
=========================================================================
Mar 15 19:24:03 ks3294494 postfix/smtpd[19765]: warning: support for restriction "check_relay_domains" will be removed from Postfix; use "reject_unauth_destination" instead
Mar 15 15:53:03 ks3294494 postfix/smtpd[17473]: fatal: parameter "smtpd_recipient_restrictions": specify at least one working instance of: check_relay_domains, reject_unauth_destination, reject, defer or defer_if_permit
# cat mail.err
=========================================================================
Mar 15 15:53:03 ks3294494 postfix/smtpd[17473]: fatal: parameter "smtpd_recipient_restrictions": specify at least one working instance of: check_relay_domains, reject_unauth_destination, reject, defer or defer_if_permit
=========================================================================
Une centaine de pages plus tard, je suis toujours dans les choux, j'ai la rate qui se dilate et je ne
parviens toujours pas à effectuer correctement mes relais…
Si vous avez une piste sérieuse, ne vous abstenez pas !
Ph. Gras
Reply to: