[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Port que canvia cada vegada que reinicie, que dimonis hi ha funcionant ahi????



Humm... Interessant això del bastille, gràcies.

En lo que respecta al que diu en Marc Olive.
Si tens tota la raó el desinstal·le i au. Si me fa falta el torne a instal·lar i au. Moltes gràcies.

Li he posat al arranc que execute
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/icmp_echo_ignore_all
per evitar els pings i que la meva maquina responga i quan vulga doncs faig
echo "0" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/icmp_echo_ignore_all
i ja torna a contestar.

Moltes gràcies a tots. Jeje! :)

XAvi.




2011/3/21 Jordi Funollet <jordi.f@ati.es>
'bastille' és una eina per detectar serveis que no ens calen, però de
forma activa. En lloc de limitar-se a fer les modificacions, explica
quines implicacions tenen i pregunta a l'usuari si vol aplicar-les.


-------------------------------------------------
Description: Security hardening tool
 Bastille Linux is a security hardening program for GNU/Linux.
 It increases the security of the system either by disabling
 services (if they are not necessary) or by altering their
 configuration.
 .
 If run in the (recommended) Interactive mode, Bastille
 educates the administrator during the hardening process:
 in each step of the process, extensive descriptions are
 given of what security issues are involved. Each step is
 optional. If run in the quicker Automated mode, Bastille
 hardens the system according the profile chosen.
 .
 Bastille Linux works for several Linux distributions.
 This package has been specifically modified to work for
 Debian GNU/Linux.
-------------------------------------------------

--
##############################
### Jordi Funollet
### http://www.terraquis.net


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-catalan-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 20110321111541.128967c6@gong" target="_blank">http://lists.debian.org/20110321111541.128967c6@gong



Reply to: