Re: Another ARM patch
Daniel Jacobowitz <email@example.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 1999 at 04:36:23PM -0700, Jim Pick wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Here are some more fixes to get everything working on ARM. I did this
> > against 0pre7.
> > I used "Architecture: any" instead of "Architecture: ARCH" in
> > control.in for the the gcc-soft-float package, because of the cpp bug
> > I encountered.
> Shouldn't it just be "Architecture: arm" anyway?
It could be. Because control is dynamically generated from control.in
anyways, there really isn't any difference between hardcoding "arm",
using "ARCH" (a macro which gets replaced with "arm", if cpp was
working), or using "any" (the gcc-soft-float stanza is in an #ifdef