[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1116635: marked as done (missing dependency on texlive-luatex)

Your message dated Mon, 29 Sep 2025 16:09:14 +0200
with message-id <0fbda365-aebd-4e79-ab67-3dcf1dfc2c0d@web.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#1116635: missing dependency on texlive-luatex
has caused the Debian Bug report #1116635,
regarding missing dependency on texlive-luatex
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1116635: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1116635
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: src:texlive-extra
Severity: important
thanks
Severity set to important to try and halt migration to testing if possible. Feel free to adjust if required.
I'm also not sure this is actually texlive-extra; it's just what dpkg -S reported who owns the related file, and I see there was a recent update. Please do reassign if I'm offbase here.
On update, dpkg triggers caused install to fail for tex-common, and there was a message in my apt output indicating the crash was logged in 
/tmp/fmtutil.XNhTCSFq

The related looking snippit from the output is:

```
Defining UNIX/DOS style filename parser.

catcodes, registers, parameters,
LaTeX2e <2025-11-01> pre-release-2 (develop 2025-9-29 branch)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex-dev/l3kernel/expl3.ltx
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex-dev/l3kernel/expl3-code.tex...hare/tex
live/texmf-dist/tex/latex-dev/l3kernel/expl3.lua:318: module 'lua-uni-data' not
 found:
	no field package.preload['lua-uni-data']
	[kpse lua searcher] file not found: 'lua-uni-data'
stack traceback:
	[C]: in function 'require'
	...hare/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex-dev/l3kernel/expl3.lua:318: in main chunk

	[C]: in function 'require'
	[\directlua]:1: in main chunk.
<inserted text> BAD

l.158     \directlua{require("expl3")}
                                      %
?
! Emergency stop.
<inserted text> BAD

l.158     \directlua{require("expl3")}
                                      %
!  ==> Fatal error occurred, bad output DVI file produced!
No pages of output.
```
On a hunch I installed texlive-luatex - and the package finished installing successfully. 

Thanks for maintaining the tex ecosystem,
  paultag

--
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀               Paul Tagliamonte <paultag>
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  https://people.debian.org/~paultag | https://pault.ag/
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋        Debian, the universal operating system.
  ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀  4096R / FEF2 EB20 16E6 A856 B98C  E820 2DCD 6B5D E858 ADF3

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 2025.20250927-2

Am 29.09.2025 um 15:40 schrieb Paul Tagliamonte:

Hello Paul,
On a hunch I installed texlive-luatex - and the package finished installing successfully.
I've uploaded texlive-extra 2025.20250927-2 this morning, which introduces that dep as first measure. I still look for a better solution, but first I have to fix the builders. 

H.
--
sigfault

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: