Re: Is blahtexml good fit for TeX team or should it salvaged to somewhere else

To: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
Cc: Package Salvaging Team <team+salvage@tracker.debian.org>, Debian TeX maintainers <debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Is blahtexml good fit for TeX team or should it salvaged to somewhere else
From: Preuße, Hilmar <hille42@web.de>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 23:41:27 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] b29e4fef-6335-4d1f-a207-8ba625541ff3@web.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Z-2Z3RJUW4iSAvfP@an3as.eu>
References: <[🔎] Z-zZdGK9tkWQ7tBE@an3as.eu> <[🔎] cc68998a-f526-4cb4-b847-f1a7e11b8d4c@web.de> <[🔎] Z-2Z3RJUW4iSAvfP@an3as.eu>

On 02.04.2025 22:11, Andreas Tille wrote:

Hi,

One of the goals of the Bug of the Day effort is to bring packages on
Salsa.  So yes, I will do so.  I simply wanted to know whether you think
it fits into TeX team.  For the moment I think I just need time to do
so since for this week I'm basically offline.

Now https://salsa.debian.org/tex-team/blahtexml is there, just thelatest changes for the NMU's need to be added.


H.
--
sigfault

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Is blahtexml good fit for TeX team or should it salvaged to somewhere else
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
- Re: Is blahtexml good fit for TeX team or should it salvaged to somewhere else
  - From: Preuße, Hilmar <hille42@web.de>
- Re: Is blahtexml good fit for TeX team or should it salvaged to somewhere else
  - From: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Is blahtexml good fit for TeX team or should it salvaged to somewhere else
Next by Date: Bug#1102046: texlive-extra-utils: bundledoc: missing dependency on libstring-shellquote-perl
Previous by thread: Re: Is blahtexml good fit for TeX team or should it salvaged to somewhere else
Next by thread: Re: Is blahtexml good fit for TeX team or should it salvaged to somewhere else
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread