On 23.12.24 Hilmar Preusse (hille42@web.de) wrote: > On 23.12.24 Lucas Nussbaum (lucas@debian.org) wrote: Hi Lucas, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to > > build on armhf. > > > > This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so this is a > > regression. Also, there are no known issues on amd64 or arm64 > > according to recent (a couple days ago) rebuilds. > > > > This seems to be caused by #1085120, although the bug is for armel. > The phenomena are about the same. I mark this bug as blocked by the > other and wait for gs 10.00.05 . > Currently gs 10.00.05 does not exists and even if it will be released tomorrow, I have doubt that it will make it into trixie. Would it be allowed to simply drop the architechtures in question for trixie and re-include it later? Hilmar
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
