Re: Request for sponsor: New TeX package ready for Debian

Hi, Hilmar

Thank you so much for your recommendation and time.

I have taken your comments into account

> Things from my side:

> 1. Recommends: zathura | okular
> --> better use pdf-viewer instead to broaden the selections here.

> 2. Recommends: texlive-latex-recommended, texlive-xetex,
> texlive-latex-extra, texlive-bibtex-extra, texlive-fonts-recommended

> Are you sure you need all these? For the first step I'd take out the
> -extra packages, as they are probably rather large.

> 3. The files below debian/* have a different license than the upstream
> sources. It is quite common to have the same licenses for both.

---
Regards, Kirill Rekhov

сб, 1 февр. 2025 г. в 01:55, Preuße, Hilmar <hille42@web.de>:

On 31.01.2025 14:11, Kirill Rekhov wrote:

Hello Kirill,

> I have prepared a new package for Debian, would you be interested?
> This package has been verified and has the confirmed tag.
> Thanks for the package.

Phil added the tag, b/c he did the technical testing by running some
test suites. Not sure if he had a deeper look at the package.

Things from my side:

1. Recommends: zathura | okular
--> better use pdf-viewer instead to broaden the selections here.

2. Recommends: texlive-latex-recommended, texlive-xetex,
texlive-latex-extra, texlive-bibtex-extra, texlive-fonts-recommended

Are you sure you need all these? For the first step I'd take out the
-extra packages, as they are probably rather large.

3. The files below debian/* have a different license than the upstream
sources. It is quite common to have the same licenses for both.

I did not do a functional test, i.e. installing it and have a look, what
it does. Not sure if I'll find the time to do so.

H.
--
sigfault