[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#946715: marked as done (texlive-lang-japanese: should recommend/suggest texlive-latex-recommended)



Your message dated Wed, 01 Jun 2022 07:52:46 +0000
with message-id <E1nwJ9q-0002yb-99@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#946715: fixed in texlive-lang 2022.20220405-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #946715,
regarding texlive-lang-japanese: should recommend/suggest texlive-latex-recommended
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
946715: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946715
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: texlive-lang-japanese
Version: 2019.20191208-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

Many files in texlive-lang-japanese need files in texlive-latex-recommended.
E.g., compiling the following file


\documentclass{ltjarticle}
\begin{document}
test.
\end{document}

gives the following error without texlive-latex-recommended.
It may be a good idea for texlive-lang-japanese to recommend/suggest
to texlive-latex-recommended. In my view, texlive-latex-recommended
is recommended by too few Debian packages, while texlive-latex-recommended seems
necessary by many texlive related Debian packages...

$ lualatex test-ja.tex
This is LuaTeX, Version 1.10.0 (TeX Live 2019/Debian) 
 restricted system commands enabled.
(./test-ja.tex
LaTeX2e <2019-10-01> patch level 3

luaotfload | main : initialization completed in 0.182 seconds
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/luatex/luatexja/ltjarticle.cls
Document Class: ltjarticle 2019/10/17 v1.8c-ltj-17 Standard LuaLaTeX-ja class
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/luatex/luatexja/luatexja.sty
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/luatex/luatexja/luatexja-core.sty
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/luatex/luatexbase/luatexbase.sty
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/luatex/ctablestack/ctablestack.sty))
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/oberdiek/ltxcmds.sty)

! LaTeX Error: File `pdftexcmds.sty' not found.

Type X to quit or <RETURN> to proceed,
or enter new name. (Default extension: sty)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.3.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages texlive-lang-japanese depends on:
ii  fonts-ipaexfont-gothic  00401-2
ii  fonts-ipaexfont-mincho  00401-2
ii  fonts-ipafont-gothic    00303-20
ii  fonts-ipafont-mincho    00303-20
ii  ruby                    1:2.5.2
ii  tex-common              6.13
ii  texlive-base            2019.20191208-4
ii  texlive-binaries        2019.20190605.51237-3
ii  texlive-lang-cjk        2019.20191208-1

texlive-lang-japanese recommends no packages.

texlive-lang-japanese suggests no packages.

Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii  dpkg  1.19.7
ii  ucf   3.0038+nmu1

Versions of packages tex-common suggests:
ii  debhelper  12.7.1

Versions of packages texlive-lang-japanese is related to:
ii  tex-common        6.13
ii  texlive-binaries  2019.20190605.51237-3

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: texlive-lang
Source-Version: 2022.20220405-3
Done: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
texlive-lang, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 946715@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> (supplier of updated texlive-lang package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2022 09:04:09 +0200
Source: texlive-lang
Architecture: source
Version: 2022.20220405-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian TeX Task Force <debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
Closes: 929156 946715
Changes:
 texlive-lang (2022.20220405-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Upload to unstable.
   * texlive-lang-japanese recommends texlive-latex-recommended
     (Closes: #946715)
   * texlive-lang-japanese suggests fonts-noto-cjk-extra
     (Closes: #929156)
   * Some Lintian cleanup.
Checksums-Sha1:
 5014416775af788e79ebad02390b0a69b55e2c5b 3456 texlive-lang_2022.20220405-3.dsc
 4c258e644e186abbbe2b5341e7b3f2c47901e290 96676 texlive-lang_2022.20220405-3.debian.tar.xz
 89bd227d97df05791114f27087d4edf6c097a257 5609 texlive-lang_2022.20220405-3_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 b3a3ce6fd5570c3c61a329a6c64a76e447beb9e103d3166178eb602838e6b2b9 3456 texlive-lang_2022.20220405-3.dsc
 34b430fe124f67c2f1a2684ff5ce2550a7c3a808172c722fcad1aaa32516776c 96676 texlive-lang_2022.20220405-3.debian.tar.xz
 1ffbf87e21abeab071529f7fdd084e25edb038d1b53514b00c85af9851926246 5609 texlive-lang_2022.20220405-3_source.buildinfo
Files:
 bebbad76017f9ad626466cd8f9dae200 3456 tex optional texlive-lang_2022.20220405-3.dsc
 de9c51927e60cd89d707b62becbd5c61 96676 tex optional texlive-lang_2022.20220405-3.debian.tar.xz
 29ee453788d092e2977f626686e6da62 5609 tex optional texlive-lang_2022.20220405-3_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEaXGmC/nkbIhxf16kxiZYRqvgLIsFAmKXFCZfFIAAAAAALgAo
aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDY5
NzFBNjBCRjlFNDZDODg3MTdGNUVBNEM2MjY1ODQ2QUJFMDJDOEIACgkQxiZYRqvg
LIsY5Q/9FfP5WGINFbYO8TPDRep4habT0XZ5MSrMlbH3fUfXoMe7UWqUdIW6uQD6
m72/aDmRQI9JRZr0NIQmarYCiJYYoPMsYwAAvO9d5+wfbXxlGolOei5269OyD36J
aktSU7aVEi/QIVkN4FeV2mlmvI65dFzYRQVEZf+BWLualz2b0Bq+pYlrobb6A75R
qqkLSWmXy4tcC1W67bLUPUvOrTEF8lCjf67TyENfh49m29f/p8giMuIJQIny/2X3
bF7oRi9Xr8PMtrhbaI4qd+5TQnf0ImTRAvAn0QJRXJWxgSdU5oH+XNLZ0VcdpkH7
cS45SgG22bVfHIbcuGGeaO1Ssj20yPMv8G+Byubrwm+XG9Cfw8CgZMEGLWQmGU24
usL1D4dSTfECFQTHwFSeXJUbhHyv+ANJac40D7RhpqfFgXvEpwydG0Id6c0mhMAQ
XMWjAyUzDesMjN3K1BwRjE/MtuTjP7uJzI4nJ/4hJEOtZNgVoYUHAs3LRdQYh8Lx
xj1VeZK8TG0HvTGISxBtKuy6RMAf3pf9kowe/UH10Tc10gdtgkDcBVj5u+U+VpRm
c0hRCfRscbDLpnK8JBuMjkvkp6ERqKWG6xMj9HqIDF/Q6KuHIUz44QNZjii3e8Sa
kvbI+Xa3dY7raoM89tRxkjD+HPbsD+YofhBUnZP66sv2pZpaNb4=
=WekG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: