Bug#986686: missing b-d netpbm?
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 09:39:05AM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> Am 14.07.2021 um 00:50 teilte Norbert Preining mit:
>...
> I understand this as: we branch from 20200329-1 and go with
> "20200329-1bullseye1".
20200329-1+deb11u1 would be the normal versioning for that,
but see below.
> In this case we have a rather small debdiff.
> I could use "20200329-2", but this version will never appear in the
> changelog of the master. Note sure if this would be OK.
The release team wants changes to go through unstable,
I would suggest to upload 20210308-2 to unstable and try to
get an unblock for that on the basis of "only documentation".
Otherwise you end up with 20210308+really20200329-1.
> > Please:
> > - prepare a debdiff (even if it is long)
>...
If requesting an unblock for 20210308-2, a debdiff of debian/
contains the relevant changes.
Something like
debdiff texworks-manual_20200329-1.dsc texworks-manual_20210308-2.dsc | filterdiff -p1 -i debian\*
cu
Adrian
Reply to: