Bug#986686: missing b-d netpbm?

[Hilmar Preuße <hille42@web.de>]

Am 13.07.2021 um 16:13 teilte Adrian Bunk mit:
> Control: severity -1 serious
> Control: tags -1 ftbfs
> Control: found -1 20150506-2
>
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 07:05:05PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + pending
> >
> > Am 10.04.2021 um 11:59 teilte Matthias Klose mit:
> > > On 4/9/21 11:14 PM, Hilmar Preuße wrote:

Hi Adrian,

> > > > The Makefile has a fallback to netpbm, but this does not work as
> > > > we  do not declare a B-D on netpbm. We could simply add it.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > yes, that would be nice. Afaics, Ubuntu disabled that explicitly in
> > > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1ubuntu3
> > Patch tested and committed to github, tag pending.
>
> Please upload, since this is now also a FTBFS in Debian:
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/buster/amd64/texworks-manual.html
>
> See #987504 for background.
Will you accept a new upstream snapshot to fix the issue?

In this case I'd branch from our commit 
d85a18296e529ed7ba4af1945fab8c90670835a6 and use that one as starter. It 
is just documentation so it should not break other packages.

Hilmar
--
sigfault

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature