Bug#986686: missing b-d netpbm?

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>]

Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tags -1 ftbfs
Control: found -1 20150506-2

On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 07:05:05PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + pending
> 
> Am 10.04.2021 um 11:59 teilte Matthias Klose mit:
> > On 4/9/21 11:14 PM, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > > The Makefile has a fallback to netpbm, but this does not work as
> > > we  do not declare a B-D on netpbm. We could simply add it.
> > > 
> > > What do you think?
> > 
> > yes, that would be nice. Afaics, Ubuntu disabled that explicitly in
> > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/8:6.9.10.23+dfsg-2.1ubuntu3
> > 
> Patch tested and committed to github, tag pending.

Please upload, since this is now also a FTBFS in Debian:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/buster/amd64/texworks-manual.html

See #987504 for background.

> Hilmar

cu
Adrian