Bug#976405: Bug#976495: also happens on amd64, should be worked around by 1.8.20-5 but the real fix will come with 1.8.20-6
- To: paolo.greppi@libpf.com, 976495@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: 976405@bugs.debian.org, 976475@bugs.debian.org, 976501@bugs.debian.org, 976508@bugs.debian.org, 976519@bugs.debian.org, 976535@bugs.debian.org, 976538@bugs.debian.org, 976544@bugs.debian.org, 976547@bugs.debian.org, 976554@bugs.debian.org, 976556@bugs.debian.org, 976574@bugs.debian.org, 976586@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#976405: Bug#976495: also happens on amd64, should be worked around by 1.8.20-5 but the real fix will come with 1.8.20-6
- From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 20:34:53 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20201205193453.GA21205@xanadu.blop.info>
- Reply-to: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>, 976405@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 89ce524d-7ae6-1bd4-5e66-7db9a5a85b5b@libpf.com>
- References: <20201205125816.GA23439@xanadu.blop.info> <[🔎] 89ce524d-7ae6-1bd4-5e66-7db9a5a85b5b@libpf.com> <[🔎] d48bbd6a-1361-ad52-0048-2b1a0ed79765@libpf.com>
[ Copying other bugs affected by new latex failures since my last
rebuild ]
Hi Paolo,
On 05/12/20 at 18:55 +0100, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Hi Lucas (is it you, or a bot?),
I'm not a bot, but only noticed this message by chance. Remember that
bug submitters do not receive emails sent to nnnnnn@bugs.debian.org
> thanks for the new bug report about doxygen 1.8.20-4 FTBFS on arm64:
> https://bugs.debian.org/976495
>
> I had noticed this issue yesterday and worked around it with 1.8.20-5 but the real fix will come with 1.8.20-6, thanks to a tip from Norbert Preining:
> https://bugs.debian.org/976405#10
>
> It would be interesting to know when you last run the archive rebuild on arm64 or amd64, because it's not clear since when this error happens.
I last ran an archive rebuild on 24/11. Successful log for doxygen is
at:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/12/05/tmp/doxygen_1.8.20-4_unstable.log
There was a texlive update in the meantime. Here are the versions of
packages that differ.
< texlive-base_2020.20200925-1
---
> texlive-base_2020.20201203-2
438,446c434,442
< texlive-extra-utils_2020.20200925-1
< texlive-font-utils_2020.20200925-1
< texlive-fonts-recommended_2020.20200925-1
< texlive-latex-base_2020.20200925-1
< texlive-latex-extra_2020.20200925-1
< texlive-latex-recommended_2020.20200925-1
< texlive-luatex_2020.20200925-1
< texlive-pictures_2020.20200925-1
< texlive-plain-generic_2020.20200925-1
---
> texlive-extra-utils_2020.20201129-1
> texlive-font-utils_2020.20201129-1
> texlive-fonts-recommended_2020.20201203-2
> texlive-latex-base_2020.20201203-2
> texlive-latex-extra_2020.20201129-1
> texlive-latex-recommended_2020.20201203-2
> texlive-luatex_2020.20201203-2
> texlive-pictures_2020.20201203-2
> texlive-plain-generic_2020.20201129-1
Also, I noticed a few new latex-related failures in this archive rebuild.
https://bugs.debian.org/976475
https://bugs.debian.org/976501
https://bugs.debian.org/976508
https://bugs.debian.org/976519
https://bugs.debian.org/976535
https://bugs.debian.org/976538
https://bugs.debian.org/976544
https://bugs.debian.org/976547
https://bugs.debian.org/976554
https://bugs.debian.org/976556
https://bugs.debian.org/976574
https://bugs.debian.org/976586
Lucas
Reply to: