Your message dated Tue, 30 Jul 2019 19:17:56 +0200 with message-id <f55cdb7a-b6ce-602e-9da4-6e90b0a071b9@web.de> and subject line Re: Bug#823117: Bug#815369: texi2pdf output filename bug? has caused the Debian Bug report #823117, regarding texi2pdf: fails if underscore appears in output filename to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 823117: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823117 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: gcc-5-doc: FTBFS in sid: ./gnat_rm.aux:1: TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [input stack size=5000].
- From: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 01:48:31 +0100
- Message-id: <20160221004831.13540.58801.reportbug@zam581.zam.kfa-juelich.de>
Source: gcc-5-doc Version: 5.2.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Hi, gcc-5-doc FTBFS with the latest texlive in sid. The build log ends with: [...] This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.16 (TeX Live 2015/Debian) (preloaded format=pdfetex) restricted \write18 enabled. entering extended mode (/build/gcc-5-doc-5.2.0/gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi (/usr/share/texmf/tex/texinfo/texinfo.tex Loading texinfo [version 2016-02-05.07.deb1]: pdf, fonts, markup, glyphs, page headings, tables, conditionals, indexing, sectioning, toc, environments, defuns, macros, cross references, insertions, (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/epsf/epsf.tex This is `epsf.tex' v2.7.4 <14 February 2011> ) localization, formatting, and turning on texinfo input format.) [1{/var/lib/t exmf/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}] (./gnat_rm.toc [-1] [-2] [-3] [-4] [-5] [-6] [-7] [-8] [-9] [-10] [-11] [-12] [-13] [-14] [-15]) [-16] (./gnat_rm.toc) (./gnat_rm.toc) (./gnat_rm.aux ./gnat_rm.aux:1: TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [input stack size=5000]. @value ->@begingroup @makevalueexpandable @valuexxx @makevalueexpandable ->@let @value = @expandablevalue @catcode `@-=@other @c... @value ->@begingroup @makevalueexpandable @valuexxx @makevalueexpandable ->@let @value = @expandablevalue @catcode `@-=@other @c... @value ->@begingroup @makevalueexpandable @valuexxx @makevalueexpandable ->@let @value = @expandablevalue @catcode `@-=@other @c... ... l.1 ...alue, is not set.} doc-title}{@putwordTOC } ./gnat_rm.aux:1: ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced! Transcript written on gnat_rm.log. /usr/bin/texi2dvi: pdfetex exited with bad status, quitting. debian/Makefile:184: recipe for target 'gnat_rm.pdf' failed make[2]: *** [gnat_rm.pdf] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory '/build/gcc-5-doc-5.2.0' debian/rules:56: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_build' failed make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_build] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/build/gcc-5-doc-5.2.0' debian/rules:53: recipe for target 'build' failed make: *** [build] Error 2 Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 823117-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#823117: Bug#815369: texi2pdf output filename bug?
- From: Hilmar Preuße <hille42@web.de>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 19:17:56 +0200
- Message-id: <f55cdb7a-b6ce-602e-9da4-6e90b0a071b9@web.de>
- In-reply-to: <20190204220641.sp6fcd65e2lzpzsc@haka.dresden.de>
- References: <20160430215758.GA3117@sas.upenn.edu> <20160221004831.13540.58801.reportbug@zam581.zam.kfa-juelich.de> <20190204220641.sp6fcd65e2lzpzsc@haka.dresden.de>
Version: 6.3.0.dfsg.1 Am 04.02.2019 um 23:06 teilte Hilmar Preusse mit: > On 30.04.16 Guo Yixuan (culu.gyx@gmail.com) wrote: > > Dear Guo, > > https://bugs.debian.org/823117 > > This bug was cloned from the (unrelated) bug #815369. > > I retested if the issue is till in latest texinfo and found that it > was solved at least in texinfo => 6.3.0.dfsg.1, i.e. Debian stable. > > Could you confirm? I'd like to close the issue then. > No reaction from submitter for nearly half a year and issue probably solved. Closing. Hilmar -- sigfault #206401 http://counter.li.orgAttachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---