Your message dated Sun, 28 Jul 2019 20:44:11 +0200 with message-id <1a2b75ce-223d-d4ac-8dbd-068f28c8ace9@web.de> and subject line Re: Bug#684409: texlive-lang-french: missing dependencies for facture class has caused the Debian Bug report #684409, regarding texlive-lang-french: missing dependencies for facture class to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 684409: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684409 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: texlive-lang-french: missing dependencies for facture class
- From: Gabriel Kerneis <kerneis@pps.jussieu.fr>
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:16:12 +0200
- Message-id: <20120809171612.18810.91942.reportbug@wacehi.kerneis.info>
Package: texlive-lang-french Version: 2012.20120611-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, the texlive-lang-french provides (among others) the facture class. To be used, this class requires the following packages: - texlive-xetex, for the xetex/xelatex binary - texlive-latex-extra, for makecmds.sty - etoolbox, for etoolbox.sty - texlive-generic-extra, for fltpoint.sty. I'm not sure whether these should be mandatory or only recommanded dependencies, but it would help a lot not having to look for them one by one. Kind regards, -- Gabriel Kerneis ###################################### List of ls-R files -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1544 Aug 9 18:55 /var/lib/texmf/ls-R lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Apr 23 16:04 /usr/share/texmf/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Jun 26 00:39 /usr/share/texlive/texmf/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEMAIN -rw-rw-r-- 1 root staff 80 Aug 9 18:32 /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Jun 26 00:39 /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEDIST lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Jun 26 00:39 /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEDIST lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Jun 26 00:39 /usr/share/texlive/texmf/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEMAIN ###################################### Config files -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 475 May 10 21:53 /etc/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4531 Aug 9 18:55 /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Jun 26 00:39 /usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg -> /var/lib/texmf/updmap.cfg-DEBIAN -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3731 Aug 9 18:55 /var/lib/texmf/tex/generic/config/language.dat ###################################### Files in /etc/texmf/web2c/ total 8 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 283 Jun 26 2011 mktex.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 475 May 10 21:53 texmf.cnf ###################################### md5sums of texmf.d ca40c66f144b4bafc3e59a2dd32ecb9c /etc/texmf/texmf.d/00debian.cnf -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages texlive-lang-french depends on: ii dpkg 1.16.3 ii tex-common 3.10 ii texlive-base 2012.20120611-3 ii texlive-common 2012.20120611-3 texlive-lang-french recommends no packages. texlive-lang-french suggests no packages. Versions of packages tex-common depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.42 ii dpkg 1.16.3 ii ucf 3.0025+nmu3 Versions of packages tex-common suggests: ii debhelper 9.20120419 Versions of packages texlive-lang-french is related to: ii tex-common 3.10 ii texlive-binaries 2012.20120628-2 -- debconf information: tex-common/check_texmf_wrong: tex-common/check_texmf_missing:
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 684409-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#684409: texlive-lang-french: missing dependencies for facture class
- From: Hilmar Preuße <hille42@web.de>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2019 20:44:11 +0200
- Message-id: <1a2b75ce-223d-d4ac-8dbd-068f28c8ace9@web.de>
- In-reply-to: <87fw7s8lc1.fsf@riesling.miltenberg.kuesterei.ch>
- References: <20120809171612.18810.91942.reportbug@wacehi.kerneis.info> <87fw7s8lc1.fsf@riesling.miltenberg.kuesterei.ch>
Am 12.08.2012 um 12:18 teilte Frank Kuester mit: > Gabriel Kerneis <kerneis@pps.jussieu.fr> writes: Hi, >> the texlive-lang-french provides (among others) the facture class. To be >> used, this class requires the following packages: >> - texlive-xetex, for the xetex/xelatex binary >> - texlive-latex-extra, for makecmds.sty >> - etoolbox, for etoolbox.sty >> - texlive-generic-extra, for fltpoint.sty. >> >> I'm not sure whether these should be mandatory or only recommanded >> dependencies, but it would help a lot not having to look for them one by one. > > They are for sure not mandatory, since not everyone who installs > texlive-lang-french wants to use the facture class. Unless you convince > me that most or at least really many french TeX users use it, I think > that even Recommends is too much. The question is rather whether we > make it a Suggests - or nothing at all, > I vote for not change anything. Yes, I'm not very stringent in my decisions: when there are only small changes I apply them. In this case however people should use the apt-file tool and start searching for the file they need to compile a specific document. We can't solve every kind of missing deps. Sorry! Hilmar -- sigfault #206401 http://counter.li.orgAttachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---