Bug#930292: texlive-luatex: lualatex uses huge memory for Noto CJK fonts,Re: Bug#930292: texlive-luatex: lualatex uses huge memory for Noto CJK fonts
Hi Hilmar,
I forgot to mention one thing.
The version of luaotfload was 2.98 (almost the same as your 2.97).
What I saw may be the same as what you told.
I tend to agree with the upstream developer
as he also consideres this issue as an open bug at
https://github.com/u-fischer/luaotfload/issues/49
Anyway 1.8 GB is much better (for Japanese) than 6GB.
Ryutaroh
From: Ryutaroh Matsumoto <ryutaroh.matsumoto@nagoya-u.jp>
Subject: Re: Bug#930292: texlive-luatex: lualatex uses huge memory for Noto CJK fonts,Re: Bug#930292: texlive-luatex: lualatex uses huge memory for Noto CJK fonts
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 10:39:30 +0900 (JST)
> Hi Hilmar,
>
> Thank you for your response.
> I have checked this issue under TeXLive 2019 as of July 18
> (installed by "install-tl") under ubuntu 19.04
> (not debian/ubuntu packages)
>
> The memory consumption of the latex file included in this
> bug report was "only" 1.8 GB after rm -rf ~/.texlive2019.
> Noto CJK fonts versions are those of ubuntu 19.04
> (not the latest ones).
> It was 6 GB when I filed this report.
> Maybe 32-bit Linux can now handle the Noto CJK fonts.
>
> At least we can say significant improvement is in the upstream,
> though 1.8 GB seems a bit larger than necessary...
>
> I again compiled the same latex file by xelatex,
> but the processing finished immediately and
> I could not see the memory consumption by "top"...
>
> Ryutaroh
>
>
> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Hilmar_Preu=c3=9fe?= <hille42@web.de>
> Subject: Re: Bug#930292: texlive-luatex: lualatex uses huge memory for Noto
> CJK fonts,Re: Bug#930292: texlive-luatex: lualatex uses huge memory for Noto CJK fonts
> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 16:24:39 +0200
>
>> On 18.07.19 13:39, Ryutaroh Matsumoto wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ryutaroh,
>>
>>> I believe that the problem is spotted and fixed at
>>> https://github.com/u-fischer/luaotfload/issues/55
>>>
>>> The above seems to be uploaded to ctan on July 15.
>>> Maybe the next release of texlive-luatex package will close
>>> this issue without special effort.
>>>
>>
>> 2019-05-18 luaotfload v2.97
>> * fix issue #47
>> * fix whatsits interfering with letterspacing (issue #53)
>> * fix luaotfload-tool switches version and find not working
>> correctly (PR#59)
>> * fix luaotfload-tool support of ttc fonts (PR#58)
>> * sync with context files from 2019-05-18 (improves handling of
>> large fonts, see e.g. issue #55 and PR#58)
>>
>> So, I'd expect that v2.97 solves the problem. This version however is in
>> Debian unstable, hence I gave it another try. I've noticed a virtual
>> memory allocation of luatex having a size of 1,9 GB when building the
>> cache. Not sure, if this is an significant improvement over the initial
>> situation.
>>
>> Hilmar
>> --
>> sigfault
>> #206401 http://counter.li.org
>>
Reply to: