Bug#570941: marked as done (featpost.sgml.gz should be compiled)

["Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>]

Your message dated Thu, 18 Jul 2019 11:46:21 +0200
with message-id <163db459-d4a8-62e9-16b3-10f1e0b777f8@web.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#570931: featpost.sgml.gz should be compiled
has caused the Debian Bug report #570931,
regarding featpost.sgml.gz should be compiled
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
570931: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570931
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

--- Begin Message ---

• To: submit@bugs.debian.org
• Subject: featpost.sgml.gz should be compiled
• From: Pietro Battiston <toobaz@email.it>
• Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:43:04 +0100
• Message-id: <1266835384.8675.525.camel@vousci>

Package: texlive-metapost-doc
Version: 2009-7

The package contains file

/usr/share/doc/texlive-metapost-doc/metapost/featpost/doc/featpost.sgml.gz

Consider that:
- as far as I know, no native views are available for (that?) sgml
- the compilation is not trivial: it must be done with
      gunzip featpost.sgml.gz
      linuxdoc featpost.sgml --backend=BACKEND
  where the only BACKEND that seems to work is "html".

So I'd ask to please ship (also?) an html version.

Pietro

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Questa =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message ---

• To: Pietro Battiston <toobaz@email.it>, 570931-done@bugs.debian.org
• Subject: Re: Bug#570931: featpost.sgml.gz should be compiled
• From: Hilmar Preuße <hille42@web.de>
• Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 11:46:21 +0200
• Message-id: <163db459-d4a8-62e9-16b3-10f1e0b777f8@web.de>
• In-reply-to: <1266835380.8675.524.camel@vousci>
• References: <1266835380.8675.524.camel@vousci>

Version: 2016.20170123-5

On 22.02.10 11:43, Pietro Battiston wrote:

> The package contains file
> 
> /usr/share/doc/texlive-metapost-doc/metapost/featpost/doc/featpost.sgml.gz
> 
> Consider that:
> - as far as I know, no native views are available for (that?) sgml
> - the compilation is not trivial: it must be done with
>       gunzip featpost.sgml.gz
>       linuxdoc featpost.sgml --backend=BACKEND
>   where the only BACKEND that seems to work is "html".
> 
> So I'd ask to please ship (also?) an html version.
> 
This file is gone from Debian. Instead we have:

/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/metapost/featpost/doc/Exemplifier.pdf
/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/metapost/featpost/doc/alldefs.txt.gz
/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/metapost/featpost/doc/featpostbeamer.pdf
/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/metapost/featpost/doc/featpostbeamer.tex
/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/metapost/featpost/doc/featpostdocsource.tex.gz
/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/metapost/featpost/doc/featpostmanual.pdf
/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/metapost/featpost/doc/featpostmanual.tex
/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/metapost/featpost/doc/lastfiguretest.pdf
/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/metapost/featpost/doc/lastfiguretest.tex
/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/metapost/featpost/doc/letterfor3Dand4D.pdf
/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/metapost/featpost/doc/letterfor3Dand4D.tex.gz

I'm closing the bug at this point as solved.

Hilmar
-- 
sigfault
#206401 http://counter.li.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--- End Message ---