[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#390190: texlive-base: Better dependency chains



On 29.09.06 19:25, Frank Küster wrote:

Hi Frank, hi Norbert,

> I was just trying to suggest proper dependencies for debiandoc-sgml, as
> an alternative to teTeX, and wondered why texlive-latex-extra does not
> depend on texlive-latex-recommended.  This means that a package that
> needs files from both packages has to depend on both.  However, I was
> under the impression that there's kind of a "hierarchy" of packages,
> texlive-latex-base < texlive-latex-recommended < texlive-latex-extra,
> and no one would only want -extra without recommended.  
> 
> Obviously this was wrong - why?
> 
What to w/ that report? Two drunken people speaking to each other, but
no real result. Do we hat to take that report seriously?

If yes, two new deps needs to be introduced:

- texlive-fonts-extra dep on texlive-fonts-recommended
- texlive-generic-extra dep on texlive-generic-recommended

Hilmar
-- 
sigfault
#206401 http://counter.li.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: