[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#907823: marked as done (texlive-latex-extra: adequate reports a broken symlink in texlive-latex-extra)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Jul 2019 17:13:58 +0200
with message-id <c8f34df8-e612-1fed-1a20-c186bb79dd6a@web.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#907823: texlive-latex-extra: adequate reports a broken symlink in texlive-latex-extra
has caused the Debian Bug report #907823,
regarding texlive-latex-extra: adequate reports a broken symlink in texlive-latex-extra
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
907823: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=907823
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: texlive-latex-extra
Version: 2018.20180824-1
Severity: normal

Usertags: broken-symlink adequate
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

While installing texlive-latex-extra reportbug reported a broken symlink at

texlive-latex-extra: broken-symlink
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/pdfx/sRGB_IEC61966-2-1_black_scaled.icc
->
../../../../../color/icc/sRGB_IEC61966-2-1_black_scaled.icc

If icc-profiles is a necessity then shouldn't it be in dependency
rather than suggests. I am confused.


######################################
 List of ls-R files

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1200 Sep  2 21:38 /var/lib/texmf/ls-R
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Aug 17  2017 /usr/share/texmf/ls-R ->
/var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Aug 24 07:41
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEDIST
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Aug 24 07:41
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEDIST
######################################
 Config files
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 475 Mar 21 21:10 /etc/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 33 Aug 24 07:41
/usr/share/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf ->
/var/lib/texmf/fmtutil.cnf-DEBIAN
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Aug 24 07:41
/usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg -> /var/lib/texmf/updmap.cfg-DEBIAN
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2763 Aug 29 11:26
/var/lib/texmf/tex/generic/config/language.dat
######################################
 Files in /etc/texmf/web2c/
total 8
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 283 Aug 17  2017 mktex.cnf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 475 Mar 21 21:10 texmf.cnf
######################################
 md5sums of texmf.d
ca40c66f144b4bafc3e59a2dd32ecb9c  /etc/texmf/texmf.d/00debian.cnf

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (100,
'unstable-debug'), (100, 'experimental-debug'), (100, 'experimental'),
(100, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.17.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages texlive-latex-extra depends on:
ii  preview-latex-style        11.91-1
ii  python                     2.7.15-3
ii  tex-common                 6.09
ii  texlive-base               2018.20180824-1
ii  texlive-binaries           2018.20180824.48463-1
ii  texlive-latex-recommended  2018.20180824-1
ii  texlive-pictures           2018.20180824-1

Versions of packages texlive-latex-extra recommends:
ii  texlive-fonts-recommended  2018.20180824-1
ii  texlive-plain-generic      2018.20180824-1

Versions of packages texlive-latex-extra suggests:
pn  icc-profiles                    <none>
ii  libfile-which-perl              1.22-1
pn  libspreadsheet-parseexcel-perl  <none>
pn  python-pygments                 <none>
pn  texlive-latex-extra-doc         <none>

Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii  dpkg  1.19.0.5+b1
ii  ucf   3.0038

Versions of packages tex-common suggests:
ii  debhelper  11.3.5

Versions of packages texlive-latex-extra is related to:
ii  tex-common        6.09
ii  texlive-binaries  2018.20180824.48463-1

-- no debconf information


-- 
          Regards,
          Shirish Agarwal  शिरीष अग्रवाल
  My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
EB80 462B 08E1 A0DE A73A  2C2F 9F3D C7A4 E1C4 D2D8

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 02.09.18 18:19, shirish शिरीष wrote:

Hi,

> While installing texlive-latex-extra reportbug reported a broken symlink at
> 
> texlive-latex-extra: broken-symlink
> /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/pdfx/sRGB_IEC61966-2-1_black_scaled.icc
> ->
> ../../../../../color/icc/sRGB_IEC61966-2-1_black_scaled.icc
> 
> If icc-profiles is a necessity then shouldn't it be in dependency
> rather than suggests. I am confused.
> 
We had that once in recommends. Unfortunately the package icc-profiles
is non-free, hence we can't depend or recommend, else
texlive-latex-extra would have to got into contrib. Therefore we decided
to use a suggests here. Please have a look at changelog of the package.

Closing this non-bug.

Hilmar
-- 
sigfault
#206401 http://counter.li.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: