[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#554995: marked as done (tex4ht: should suggest JRE for oolatex)

Your message dated Tue, 2 Jul 2019 23:59:43 +0200
with message-id <00d65dbd-cd16-f773-d8cd-bc9bb6b0ba1f@web.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#554995: tex4ht: should suggest JRE for oolatex
has caused the Debian Bug report #554995,
regarding tex4ht: should suggest JRE for oolatex
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
554995: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554995
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: tex4ht
Version: 20090611-1+b1
Severity: normal

Hi there!

I need to convert a LaTeX file to OpenDocument Text, but the oolatex
command produces an empty .odt.  While looking at the oolatex output, I
discovered that it needs a JRE.

The tex4ht binary package itself does not suggests it nor the
documentation provided mentions it.  On the contrary, the suggestion is
included in the tex4ht-common binary package.  This is plainly wrong,
given that oolatex is shipped with the tex4ht binary package.

Please move the JRE suggestion to the tex4ht binary package instead.  I
guess, but I am not sure, this should apply to all binary packages
needed by other TeX4ht commands.

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages tex4ht depends on:
ii  libc6                      2.10.1-5      GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libkpathsea4               2007.dfsg.2-8 TeX Live: path search library for 
ii  tex4ht-common              20090611-1    LaTeX and TeX for Hypertext (HTML)
ii  texlive-base-bin           2007.dfsg.2-8 TeX Live: Essential binaries

tex4ht recommends no packages.

tex4ht suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Attachment: pgpnVnmDeTjaY.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 07.11.09 20:28, Luca Capello wrote:

Hi Luca,

> I need to convert a LaTeX file to OpenDocument Text, but the oolatex
> command produces an empty .odt.  While looking at the oolatex output, I
> discovered that it needs a JRE.
> 
> The tex4ht binary package itself does not suggests it nor the
> documentation provided mentions it.  On the contrary, the suggestion is
> included in the tex4ht-common binary package.  This is plainly wrong,
> given that oolatex is shipped with the tex4ht binary package.
> 
OK, your right: the end user does not become aware of suggest entries in
package, which are just installed as dep of another package, so this was
not implemented very good.

> Please move the JRE suggestion to the tex4ht binary package instead.  I
> guess, but I am not sure, this should apply to all binary packages
> needed by other TeX4ht commands.
> 
oolatex is gone and does not exist any more in Debian official packages.
Therefor I close the bug at this point. I you find issues in other
binaries of tex4ht let us know.

Many thanks!

Hilmar
-- 
sigfault
#206401 http://counter.li.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: