On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 09:42:11AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > On Sun, 06 Aug 2017, Holger Levsen wrote: > > jadetex package description says it's a transitional package (in stretch and > > upwards), yet it still contains stuff and not mere meta data. > It contains changelog, readme that explains the situation. Isn't that fine? > Are there any regulations that a transitional package has to be empty? > In contrast, changelog and copyright *need* to be in the package by policy. those files all need to be in the otherwise empty package, but looking at http://sources.debian.net/src/jadetex/3.13-17/ I see a lot more files. > > I guess the proper cause of action would be to remove the package from sid. > That is the plan in the near future. great, thanks. -- cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature