[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#832405: tex-common: fmtutil failed to build pdftex/cont-en xetex/cont-en as cont-en.mkii missing



On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 08:11:54 +0100 cp.montanari@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
> Package: tex-common
> Version: 6.05
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> this tex-common does not install on my system,
> here is the end of the fmtutil log...:
> 
> "...
> Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done.
> Running updmap-sys. This may take some time... done.
> Running mktexlsr /var/lib/texmf ... done.
> Building format(s) --all.
> 	This may take some time... 
> fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in
> /tmp/fmtutil.5xBG5aqo
> Please include this file if you report a bug.
> "..."
> font\OMS/cmsy/m/n/5=cmsy5
> \font\OMS/cmsy/m/n/7=cmsy7
> \font\OMS/cmsy/m/n/10=cmsy10
> 14 preloaded fonts
> warning  (pdf backend): no pages of output.
> Transcript written on lualatex.log.
> fmtutil [INFO]: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/luatex/lualatex.fmt installed.
> fmtutil [WARNING]: inifile cont-en.mkii for cont-en/pdftex not found.
> fmtutil [WARNING]: inifile cont-en.mkii for cont-en/xetex not found.
> fmtutil [INFO]: Disabled formats: 3
> fmtutil [INFO]: Successfully rebuilt formats: 19
> fmtutil [INFO]: Failed to build: 2 (pdftex/cont-en xetex/cont-en)
> fmtutil [INFO]: Total formats: 24
> fmtutil [INFO]: exiting with status 2
> ..."
> 
> I wonder if this is the right problem? and how to generate this  "cont-en.mkii" file?
> 
> 
> PTZ.
> 
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: stretch/sid
>   APT prefers unstable
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> Foreign Architectures: i386
> 
> Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Init: unable to detect
> 
> Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
> ii  dpkg  1.18.9
> ii  ucf   3.0036
> 
> tex-common recommends no packages.
> 
> Versions of packages tex-common suggests:


Reply to: