Bug#820716: texlive-binaries: Fails to build format files
Hi Hilmar,
Thanks, that is to be expected. I forgot to add the necessary breaks. 2015 binaries cannot be used with 2015 packages.
Norbert
On April 12, 2016 1:42:47 AM GMT+09:00, "Hilmar Preuße" <hille42@web.de> wrote:
>Package: texlive-binaries
>Version: 2016.20160409.40358-1
>Severity: important
>
>Dear Maintainer,
>
>Currently applies only to experimental, hence severity important.
>
>I tried to install the texlive-binaries form experimental, it fails
>to configure as at least a format file could not be built. Downgrading
>to sid solved the problem:
>
>hille@sid-amd64:~$ luatex -ini -jobname=luatex -progname=luatex
>luatex.ini
>This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.95.0 (TeX Live 2016/Debian) (INITEX)
> restricted system commands enabled.
>(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/plain/config/luatex.ini
>(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/config/luatexiniconfig.tex)
>(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/config/luatex-unicode-letters.tex
>loading Unicode properties)
>(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/plain/config/pdfetex.ini
>(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/config/pdftexconfig.tex
>! Undefined control sequence.
>l.4 \pdfoutput
> =1
>? s
>OK, entering \scrollmode...
><...>
>50 preloaded fonts
>Output written on luatex.dvi (1 page, 168 bytes).
>Transcript written on luatex.log.
>hille@sid-amd64:~$
>
>Not sure if luatex is suddendly missing a feature here or if it must be
>called using a different name.
>
>Hilmar
>
>
>....System used to call reportbug differs from the affected system.
>Informations below do not apply........
>
>-- System Information:
>Debian Release: stretch/sid
> APT prefers unstable
> APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
>Architecture: i386 (i686)
>
>Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
>Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
>(ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8)
>Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
>Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
>
>Versions of packages texlive-binaries depends on:
>ii dpkg 1.18.4
>ii install-info 6.1.0.dfsg.1-5
>ii libc6 2.22-6
>ii libfontconfig1 2.11.0-6.4
>ii libfreetype6 2.6.3-3+b1
>ii libgcc1 1:5.3.1-14
>ii libgmp10 2:6.1.0+dfsg-2
>ii libgraphite2-3 1.3.8-1
>ii libgs9 9.19~dfsg-1+b1
>ii libharfbuzz-icu0 1.0.1-1+b1
>ii libharfbuzz0b 1.0.1-1+b1
>ii libice6 2:1.0.9-1+b1
>ii libicu55 55.1-7
>ii libkpathsea6 2015.20160222.37495-1
>ii libmpfr4 3.1.4-1
>ii libpaper1 1.1.24+nmu4
>ii libpixman-1-0 0.33.6-1
>ii libpoppler57 0.38.0-2+b1
>ii libpotrace0 1.13-2
>ii libptexenc1 2015.20160222.37495-1
>ii libsm6 2:1.2.2-1+b1
>ii libstdc++6 5.3.1-14
>ii libsynctex1 2015.20160222.37495-1
>ii libtexlua52 2015.20160222.37495-1
>ii libtexluajit2 2015.20160222.37495-1
>ii libx11-6 2:1.6.3-1
>ii libxaw7 2:1.0.13-1
>ii libxext6 2:1.3.3-1
>ii libxi6 2:1.7.6-1
>ii libxmu6 2:1.1.2-2
>ii libxpm4 1:3.5.11-1+b1
>ii libxt6 1:1.1.5-1
>ii libzzip-0-13 0.13.62-3
>ii perl 5.22.1-9
>ii t1utils 1.39-2
>ii tex-common 6.05
>ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1
>
>Versions of packages texlive-binaries recommends:
>ii python 2.7.11-1
>ii ruby 1:2.3.0+1
>ii texlive-base 2015.20160320-1
>pn wish <none>
>
>texlive-binaries suggests no packages.
>
>-- no debconf information
--
Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse my brevity.
Reply to: