[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#801505: texlive-latex-extra: complaint about weong file in dpkg trigger



Package: texlive-latex-extra
Version: 2015.20150917-1
Severity: normal

Hello,

I tried to ugrade libstdc++ and as a result I also needed to upgrade
TeX.

The TeX dpkg trigger complains about wrong file.

Is this expected transitional state until some packages are rebuilt or
is something broken?

Thanks

Michal

Processing triggers for tex-common (6.03) ...


Warning: Old configuration style found in /etc/texmf/updmap.d
Warning: For now these files have been included, 
Warning: but expect inconsistencies.
Warning: These packages should be rebuild with tex-common.
Warning: Please see /usr/share/doc/tex-common/NEWS.Debian.gz
Warning: found file: /etc/texmf/updmap.d/10lmodern.cfg
Warning: found file: /etc/texmf/updmap.d/10texlive-latex-extra.cfg



######################################
 List of ls-R files

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1498 Oct 11 13:17 /var/lib/texmf/ls-R
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root staff 80 Oct 17  2013 /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Sep  3 02:24 /usr/share/texmf/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Sep 17 06:57 /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEDIST
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Sep 17 06:57 /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/ls-R -> /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEDIST
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2966 Oct 16  2014 /usr/share/texlive/texmf/ls-R
######################################
 Config files
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 838 Oct 11 13:12 /etc/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4030 Oct 11 12:58 /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Sep 17 06:57 /usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg -> /var/lib/texmf/updmap.cfg-DEBIAN
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2763 Oct 11 13:17 /var/lib/texmf/tex/generic/config/language.dat
######################################
 Files in /etc/texmf/web2c/
total 8
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 283 Jun 27  2011 mktex.cnf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 838 Oct 11 13:12 texmf.cnf
######################################
 md5sums of texmf.d
ca40c66f144b4bafc3e59a2dd32ecb9c  /etc/texmf/texmf.d/00debian.cnf
1df66bc319cec731e202eaf39f5d85e1  /etc/texmf/texmf.d/96JadeTeX.cnf

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.2
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (171, 'unstable'), (151, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, armhf

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages texlive-latex-extra depends on:
ii  preview-latex-style        11.87-3+deb8u1
ii  tex-common                 6.03
ii  texlive-base               2015.20150917-1
ii  texlive-binaries           2015.20150524.37493-6
ii  texlive-latex-recommended  2015.20150917-1
ii  texlive-pictures           2015.20150917-1

Versions of packages texlive-latex-extra recommends:
ii  texlive-fonts-recommended  2015.20150917-1
ii  texlive-latex-extra-doc    2015.20150917-1

Versions of packages texlive-latex-extra suggests:
ii  libfile-which-perl              1.09-1
pn  libspreadsheet-parseexcel-perl  <none>
ii  python-pygments                 2.0.1+dfsg-1.1

Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii  dpkg  1.17.25
ii  ucf   3.0030

Versions of packages tex-common suggests:
ii  debhelper  9.20150101

Versions of packages texlive-latex-extra is related to:
ii  tex-common        6.03
ii  texlive-binaries  2015.20150524.37493-6

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/texmf/tex/latex/contour/contour.cfg 81b59058e250cbe26694be3c10a3fbc1 [Errno 2] No such file or directory: u'/etc/texmf/tex/latex/contour/contour.cfg 81b59058e250cbe26694be3c10a3fbc1'
/etc/texmf/updmap.d/10texlive-latex-extra.cfg a7e327c9ad8c69f7fbabd7101047ad13 [Errno 2] No such file or directory: u'/etc/texmf/updmap.d/10texlive-latex-extra.cfg a7e327c9ad8c69f7fbabd7101047ad13'

-- debconf information:
  tex-common/check_texmf_missing:
  tex-common/check_texmf_wrong:


Reply to: