[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#796097: marked as done (texlive-base / texlive-fonts-recommended: mflogo .tfm metrics missing)



Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 11:59:05 +0900
with message-id <20150820025905.GU20127@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#796097: texlive-base / texlive-fonts-recommended: mflogo .tfm metrics missing
has caused the Debian Bug report #796097,
regarding texlive-base / texlive-fonts-recommended: mflogo .tfm metrics missing
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
796097: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796097
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2015.20150810-1
Severity: normal

The bug affects the texlive-base and/or texlive-fonts-recommended
packages currently in testing and unstable, but not in stable. In the
migration between stable and testing, the mflogo fonts was moved from
texlive-base to texlive-fonts-recommended, but the TeX font metrics
(.tfm) have gone missing, effectively preventing (quality) use of the
font.

$ for dist in stable testing unstable ; do echo $dist ; apt-file -s /etc/apt/sources.list.d/${dist}.list search logosl8.pfb ; done
stable
texlive-base:
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/hoekwater/mflogo/logosl8.pfb
testing
texlive-fonts-recommended:
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/hoekwater/mflogo-font/logosl8.pfb
unstable
texlive-fonts-recommended:
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/hoekwater/mflogo-font/logosl8.pfb

$ for dist in stable testing unstable ; do echo $dist ; apt-file -s /etc/apt/sources.list.d/${dist}.list search logosl8.tfm ; done
stable
texlive-base:
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/tfm/public/mflogo/logosl8.tfm
testing
unstable

(I'm not sure which of the two packages it should be reported against.)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages texlive-base depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.57
ii  libpaper-utils         1.1.24+nmu4
ii  tex-common             6.02
ii  texlive-binaries       2015.20150524.37493-5
ii  ucf                    3.0030
ii  xdg-utils              1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-7.4

Versions of packages texlive-base recommends:
ii  lmodern  2.004.4-5

Versions of packages texlive-base suggests:
ii  acroread [pdf-viewer]            9.5.5-dmo2
ii  evince [postscript-viewer]       3.16.1-1
ii  ghostscript [postscript-viewer]  9.16~dfsg-2
ii  gv [postscript-viewer]           1:3.7.4-1
ii  okular [postscript-viewer]       4:4.14.2-3
pn  perl-tk                          <none>
ii  xpdf [pdf-viewer]                3.03-17+b1
ii  zathura [pdf-viewer]             0.3.3-2
ii  zathura-ps [postscript-viewer]   0.2.2-8

Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii  dpkg  1.18.1
ii  ucf   3.0030

Versions of packages tex-common suggests:
ii  debhelper  9.20150628

Versions of packages texlive-base is related to:
ii  tex-common        6.02
ii  texlive-binaries  2015.20150524.37493-5

-- debconf information:
  texlive-base/binary_chooser: pdftex, dvips, dvipdfmx, xdvi
  texlive-base/texconfig_ignorant:
  tex-common/check_texmf_wrong:
  tex-common/check_texmf_missing:

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Dear all,

Thanks to Kohda-san's work, it is now clear:

* There original .tfm files are here (like logo10.tfm) etc

> so logod10.tfm, logosl8.tfm, logosl9.tfm are missing on sid.

* For the remaining logod10 and logosl9 there are .mf files,
  so the tfm files will be created on demand

* for logosl9 there is .pfb and .afm, but there have never been
  any mf source (as far as I remember).

Thus, I cam closing this bug since everything is here.
Feel free to reopen or provide more specific bugs in case you
disagree.

ALl the best

Norbert

------------------------------------------------------------------------
PREINING, Norbert                               http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan                                 TeX Live & Debian Developer
GPG: 0x860CDC13   fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0  ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
------------------------------------------------------------------------

--- End Message ---

Reply to: