Hi Norbert, On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 05:15:15PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi Ricardo, > > I just found your bug report and I have two proposals: > * first, the ko.tex-extra-hlfont should be orphaned, too That's easy because it's already done ;) → http://bugs.debian.org/707574 > * second, I suggest *removing* this package as it is not > required by anyone, and since my last upload of > src:texlive-lang 2013.20131112-1, and uptodate (2013) > version of ko-tex is included in texlive-lang-cjk. > > I see two options: > * simple removal and I add a conflicts in texlive-lang-cjk > to that the package is removed > * I build in a addition a transitional package ko.tex etc etc > (3-4 packages) from texlive-lang-cjk to force transition. > > I am not sure what the QA Team wants. THere is the problem that > ko-tex has changed significantly since 2007, and maybe maybe > old documents cannot be set anymore. But having the version of > 2007 in the archive does not help anyone. > > My personal preference is: removal of the k.tex* package and > I just only add a conflict against ko.tex*. > > What do you think? I believe your personal preference is the right thing to do, given your summary. Filed the removal bug → http://bugs.debian.org/730016 best regards, -- Ricardo Mones, on behalf of Debian QA/MIA team http://people.debian.org/~mones «Never send a human to do a machine's job.» ~ Agent Smith
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature