[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#459438: marked as done ([Bug 179725] ucs c00 encoding should use chinese arphic fonts)

Your message dated Tue, 10 Sep 2013 11:09:38 +0900
with message-id <20130910020938.GH30160@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
and subject line Closing old and upstream bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #459438,
regarding [Bug 179725] ucs c00 encoding should use chinese arphic fonts
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
459438: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=459438
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: texlive-latex-recommended
Version: 2007-13
Severity:normal

Dear Dominique, dear Herbert, dear TeX Live team,

(Herbert:) thanks for the bug report, I have created a image of it in
the Debian Bug Database.

(TeX Live Team:) all for your information

(Dominique:) We got the following bug report which relates to the ucs
package. It seems that the mentioned sung bitmap font is not available,
while the arphic fonts are widely available and packaged for at least
Debian and Ubuntu (and for sure for many others, too).

Do you see any other problems with the approach taken below?

Would it be possible to include this in a new release of ucs?

(For Debian/Ubuntu:) I guess if we get a positive answer I will patch
this into the current TeX Live packages. Hopefully it will be fixed
upstream, too.

Thanks a lot and all the best in the new year

Norbert

On Di, 01 Jan 2008, Herbert Schmid wrote:
> Public bug reported:
> 
> Binary package hint: texlive-latex-recommended
> 
> c00enc.def refers to the definition of the sung bitmap font, while this
> definition seems not be included in any texlive package.
> 
> anyway, as I read the dependencies of latex-cjk-chinese people should
> use the new arphic truetype fonts anyway and not the old bitmaps fonts.
> 
> the following patch removes the need for the missing bitmap sung
> definition file in favor for the arphic bsmi truetype font.
> 
> the file c00enc.def belongs to the ctan package ucs and is included in
> the ubuntu package texlive-latex-recommended.
> 
> --- usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/ucs/c00enc.def_orig       2006-05-15 21:12:54.000000000 +0200
> +++ usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/ucs/c00enc.def    2008-01-01 21:20:38.000000000 +0100
> @@ -15,6 +15,6 @@
>  %% 
>  \ProvidesFile{c00enc.def}[2001/10/11 Fontencoding C00 (Big5)]%
>  \DeclareFontEncoding{C00}{}{}%
> -\DeclareFontSubstitution{C00}{song}{m}{n}%
> +\DeclareFontSubstitution{C00}{bsmi}{m}{n}%
>  \input{cenccmn.tex}%
> -\expandafter\let\csname C00/song/m/n\endcsname\undefined
> +\expandafter\let\csname C00/bsmi/m/n\endcsname\undefined
> 
> ** Affects: texlive-base (Ubuntu)
>      Importance: Undecided
>          Status: New
> 
> -- 
> ucs c00 encoding should use chinese arphic fonts
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179725
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Debian
> TeX Maintainers, which is a bug contact for texlive-base in ubuntu.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>        Vienna University of Technology
Debian Developer <preining@debian.org>                         Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094      fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIUNARY (n.)
The safe place you put something and then forget where it was.
			--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Dear bug submitter,

the bug you have submitted against one of the TeX packages concerns
not the Debian packaging of TeX Live, nor the upstream TeX Live 
distribution itself, but Up-upstream, the original author of
the respective package.

TeX Live only collects what authors provide.

Thus, neither we, the Debian TeX Team, nor the Upstream TeX Live team
can fix anything regarding this bug.

Furthermore, the bug you have reported is rather old.

We suggest you to do the following:
* verify that the bug is still present with current TeX Live (2013)
  installation on Debian
* if yes, please report the bug to the *original* author of the TeX
  package, and *not* to upstream TeX Live nor Debian

Other ways to deal with these bugs are requesting help from TeX experts,
your local TeX consultant, or local TeX User Groups. One good place to
ask questions is the newsgroup comp.text.tex, or the StackExchange
website http://tex.stackexchange.com


Thanks a lot for your understanding

Norbert

------------------------------------------------------------------------
PREINING, Norbert                               http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan                                 TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094   fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------

--- End Message ---
Reply to: