Bug#720953: fonts-texgyre: bump fontconfig hinting to 31 to win over inferior gsfonts
Hi Fabian,
with your newest package installed, and ...
> fontconfig: /etc/fonts/conf.d/70-no-bitmaps.conf
That one activated instead of 70-yes-bitmaps.conf I get:
* first the fonts form TeX Live
uhvr8a.pfb: "Nimbus Sans L" "Regular"
..
* then the fonts from fonts-gsfonts...
n019003l.pfb: "Nimbus Sans" "Regular"
...
* then TeX Gyre
texgyreheros-regular.otf: "TeX Gyre Heros" "Regular"
* then some ttf fonts of arial etc etc and other stuff
> That's the copy of Helvetica in texlive-fonts-recommended that is
> symlinked into /usr/share/fonts.
Should I remove that in the future? I guess ....
> > So a bit a different order. What might be the reason for that?
>
> I am not sure, but I have an idea. It has to do with the order in which
I dn't know, but I have also fonts.local:
<fontconfig>
<dir>/usr/local/share/texmf/fonts/opentype</dir>
<dir>/usr/local/share/texmf/fonts/type1</dir>
<dir>/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/opentype/adobe</dir>
<dir>/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/opentype/nowacki</dir>
<dir>/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/opentype/gust</dir>
</fontconfig>
But that should not interfere with the helvetica settings.
> 30-fonts-texgyre-aliases.conf config file has to be moved to slot 32.
> Else, we can wait until fonts-urw-base35 has replaced gsfonts, then the
> problem will disappear because of the ordering of the fontconfig config
Hmm, but I have installed all the .debs I got from from the fonts-gsfonts
package ..., so it should be fixed, right?
> Complicated, isn't it? But I hope I could somehow shed some light on
> this issue [personally, it helped me a lot to write it down and read
> through it again ;)].
It is mind boggling ...
Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: