Bug#721626: texlive-base: .pfm files really needed?

To: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Cc: 721626@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#721626: texlive-base: .pfm files really needed?
From: Fabian Greffrath <fabian@greffrath.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 16:42:20 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 1378132940.16032.6.camel@kff50.ghi.rwth-aachen.de>
Reply-to: Fabian Greffrath <fabian@greffrath.com>, 721626@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20130902143611.GB5226@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
References: <[🔎] 20130902141555.22328.35272.reportbug@kff50.ghi.rwth-aachen.de> <[🔎] 20130902143611.GB5226@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>

Am Montag, den 02.09.2013, 23:36 +0900 schrieb Norbert Preining: 
> Do we ship them? ;-)

Jepp, try "dpkg -S \.pfm".

> Can be trashed according to all knowledge I have.

Alright, so I'll remove them from fonts-urw-base35 as well.

- Fabian

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#721626: texlive-base: .pfm files really needed?
  - From: Fabian Greffrath <fabian@greffrath.com>
- Bug#721626: texlive-base: .pfm files really needed?
  - From: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>

Prev by Date: Bug#720953: fonts-texgyre: bump fontconfig hinting to 31 to win over inferior gsfonts
Next by Date: Bug#720953: fonts-texgyre: bump fontconfig hinting to 31 to win over inferior gsfonts
Previous by thread: Bug#721626: texlive-base: .pfm files really needed?
Next by thread: Bug#721633: texlive-fonts-recommended: contins redundant copy of Bitstream Charter
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread