Re: Removing ThaiLaTeX
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:
> On Do, 23 Mai 2013, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
>> > Yeah, I meant everything related to thai ;-)
>>
>> Only one, please. thailatex is obsolete. Please don't include it.
>
> Sure, the one that is in TL, that is babel-thai!
OK.
>> So, latex-fonts-thai-tlwg deb will also be obsolete, then?
>
> The packages I *just* uploaded contain these fonts.
> So in principle we can drop latex-fnots-thai-tlwk.
>
> My fault, shouldn't have put them into the recommends ...
>
> Anyway, the next upload (after the one today) will *drop* the
> latex-fonts-thai-tlwg from the recommends.
And I'll remove the latex-fonts-thai-tlwg binary in my next upload for
fonts-tlwg, then.
Alternatively, I may make it transitional package which depends on
texlive-lang-other.
> Since there are no other rdepends we don't need a transitional package.
Yes, after I cut the links from latex-fonts-tlwg and latex-fonts-sipa-arundina.
>> But I suppose fonts-sipa-arundina is not included in TeX Live, right?
>
> texlive-lang-other's current recommends are:
> swath, latex-fonts-thai-tlwg, texlive-latex-extra
> that should be changed to
> swath, fonts-sipa-arundina, texlive-latex-extra
>
> I assume, right?
It's named latex-fonts-sipa-arundina in Debian. Sorry for the confusion.
(fonts-sipa-arundina is its CTAN name.) And it should be just suggests:
not recommends:.
In summary:
- recommends: swath, texlive-latex-extra
- suggests: latex-fonts-sipa-arundina
Thanks,
--
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
http://linux.thai.net/~thep/
Reply to: