[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#656180: marked as done (tex-common: ! TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [pool size=1182621].)



Your message dated Thu, 10 May 2012 07:50:16 +0900
with message-id <20120509225016.GC17667@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
and subject line closing old tex-common bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #656180,
regarding tex-common: ! TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [pool size=1182621].
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
656180: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=656180
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tex-common
Version: 2.08.1
Severity: normal


Everytime I use latex on a new system, I need to edit the /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf to fix the pool size limit, since it is so low.
Could the default value be a little bigger (factor 10) ?

Thanks

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.1
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]        1.5.36.1    Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpkg                         1.15.8.11   Debian package management system
ii  ucf                          3.0025+nmu1 Update Configuration File: preserv

tex-common recommends no packages.

Versions of packages tex-common suggests:
ii  debhelper                  8.9.7~bpo60+1 helper programs for debian/rules

Versions of packages texlive-base depends on:
ii  dpkg                      1.15.8.11      Debian package management system
ii  install-info              4.13a.dfsg.1-6 Manage installed documentation in 
ii  luatex                    0.60.2-1       next generation TeX engine
ii  mime-support              3.48-1         MIME files 'mime.types' & 'mailcap
ii  texlive-binaries          2009-8         Binaries for TeX Live
ii  texlive-common            2009-11        TeX Live: Base component
ii  texlive-doc-base          2009-2         TeX Live: TeX Live documentation

-- debconf information:
  tex-common/check_texmf_wrong:
  tex-common/check_texmf_missing:



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version 3.10

Closing some bugs that were fixed by tex-common version 3:
291545: upgrade of files in texmf.d shows diff twice (plain ucf and update-texmf)
	we don't use ucf anymore
313406: tetex-bin: Drop the compatibility font paths
	we don't ship our own texmf.cnf anymore
478992: update-texmf: Basic configuration file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf missing
	we don't have this file anymore
656180: tex-common: ! TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [pool size=1182621].
	tex capacity is bumped up in TeX Live

Thanks

Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norbert Preining            preining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan                                 TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094   fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLABBY (adj.)
A 'clabby' conversation is one stuck up by a commissionaire or
cleaning lady in order to avoid any further actual work. The opening
gambit is usually designed to provoke the maximum confusion, and
therefore the longest possible clabby conversation. It is vitally
important to learn the correct, or 'clixby' (q.v.), responses to a
clabby gambit, and not to get trapped by a 'ditherington' (q.v.). For
instance, if confronted with a clabby gambit such as 'Oh, mr Smith, I
didn't know you'd had your leg off', the ditherington response is 'I
haven't....' whereas the clixby is 'good.'
			--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff


--- End Message ---

Reply to: