Re: Bug#666067: transition: libkpathsea6
Hi all,
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:12:49 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Do, 26 Apr 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> I guess the intention is that jmpost and jbibtex-bin simply go away?
>> (They're also built from ptex-bin, but don't appear to have any reverse
>> dependencies.)
>
> Kohda-san? I am not sure, I would say yes.
Hmm, wait a bit more.
If we fail to update texfam, it is no problem to remove
jbibtex-bin but if we can update texfam jbibtex-bin is
necessary. So this depends on the status of texfam.
I think jbibtex-base (not -bin!) is replaced by texlive-lang-cjk
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/pbibtex
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/pbibtex/bib
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/pbibtex/bib/jxampl.bib
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/pbibtex/bst
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/pbibtex/bst/jabbrv.bst
...
so I believe we can remove it.
I guess we can remove jmpost but, for safety, please wait
a while, I'll check it deliberately.
Yoshino-san, if you are so kind to check these, please comment.
> I will try my best to port it to libkpathsea6, but for now I gues
> if nobody else takes this job, I guess we have to live with an uninstallable
> texfam.
I also tried to build texfam with libkpathsea6 but failed
to do it.
Tsuchiya-san, any comments?
Best regards, 2012-4-27(Fri)
--
Debian Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda AT debian.org>
Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima
Reply to: