Bug#667436: texlive-latex3: maxima-emacs depends on this in Sid, but not available on servers
Package: texlive-latex3
Version: 2009-10
Severity: normal
I have maxima-emacs installed (in Sid), which depends on
texlive-latex3:
$ apt-cache depends maxima-emacs | grep texlive
Depends: <texlive-base-bin>
texlive-binaries
Depends: texlive-latex3
Unfortunately, texlive-latex3 is no longer available via APT:
$ apt-cache policy texlive-latex3
texlive-latex3:
Installed: 2009-10
Candidate: 2009-10
Version table:
*** 2009-10 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
As you see, only my currently-installed package shows up, but nothing
is available in the repos; anyone trying to install maxima-emacs will
be out of luck!
As a sanity check, this is what similar output looks like for other
packages:
$ apt-cache policy tex-common
tex-common:
Installed: 3.6
Candidate: 3.6
Version table:
*** 3.6 0
990 http://debian.osuosl.org/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
Has texlive-latex3 been dropped? Is this an error on the Debian
servers? I am experiencing no other problems similar to this with any
other packages, so I thought I should bring it to your attention.
HTH,
Dave W.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (350, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.12-2+dwlocal1 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages texlive-latex3 depends on:
ii dpkg 1.16.2
ii tex-common 3.6
ii texlive-common 2011.20120322-2
ii texlive-latex-base 2011.20120322-2
texlive-latex3 recommends no packages.
texlive-latex3 suggests no packages.
Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.42
ii dpkg 1.16.2
ii ucf 3.0025+nmu2
Versions of packages tex-common suggests:
ii debhelper 9.20120322
Versions of packages texlive-latex3 is related to:
ii tex-common 3.6
ii texlive-binaries 2011.20120328-1
-- debconf information:
tex-common/check_texmf_wrong:
tex-common/check_texmf_missing:
Reply to: